<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="bg">
	<id>http://biseri.zavinagi.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=W9yuibj615</id>
	<title>Бисери на глупостта - Потребителски приноси [bg]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://biseri.zavinagi.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=W9yuibj615"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://biseri.zavinagi.org/index.php/%D0%A1%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B8:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8/W9yuibj615"/>
	<updated>2026-04-19T05:37:55Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Потребителски приноси</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.37.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://biseri.zavinagi.org/index.php?title=How_Did_We_Get_Here%3F_The_History_of_Belize_Real_Estate_Told_Through_Tweets&amp;diff=38833</id>
		<title>How Did We Get Here? The History of Belize Real Estate Told Through Tweets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://biseri.zavinagi.org/index.php?title=How_Did_We_Get_Here%3F_The_History_of_Belize_Real_Estate_Told_Through_Tweets&amp;diff=38833"/>
		<updated>2023-05-22T10:46:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;W9yuibj615: Нова страница: „Most people understand that a Buyers Agent is the agent that represents a buyer through a real estate transaction and the Sellers Agent represents the Seller during the transaction. Often, buyers do not understand exactly what &amp;quot;Limited Agency&amp;quot; (sometimes referred to as Dual Agency) is and how it will impact their sale or purchase. In Utah, the exact definition of Limited Agency taken directly off a Limited Agency Consent Agreement from Utah Association of RE...“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Most people understand that a Buyers Agent is the agent that represents a buyer through a real estate transaction and the Sellers Agent represents the Seller during the transaction. Often, buyers do not understand exactly what &amp;quot;Limited Agency&amp;quot; (sometimes referred to as Dual Agency) is and how it will impact their sale or purchase. In Utah, the exact definition of Limited Agency taken directly off a Limited Agency Consent Agreement from Utah Association of REALTORS® reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Utah, it is legal to act as a limited agent, but is it in a buyer or sellers best interest to allow a Limited Agency? If you work exclusively with a Buyers Agent, that agent should be working to locate your home and negotiate the best deal on your behalf. They should be somewhat aware of your financial situation and how much you ultimately plan to spend for the purchase of a new home. The Sellers' Agent is hired by a seller to market the property with the intention of producing a buyer. This agent is usually aware of the sellers' position and how much they would be willing to take for the property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where the conflict may present its self. If the Agent is representing both the buyer and the seller in the same transaction, they are bound by fiduciary duties to both clients. It would be impossible to obtain the best deal if the representing agent must remain neutral. The negotiation will only result a mutually &amp;quot;acceptable&amp;quot; deal. This may or may not be the &amp;quot;best deal&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Buyers Agent, who is representing a clients interest, will be able to share pertinent information they learn that can result in a lower offer than the client may have initially presented. Alternatively, a Sellers Agent may discover the buyer will likely accept a counter resulting in a higher net to the seller. Information learned can be shared during an exclusive agency, however when Limited Agency is a factor, this information can not be shared. In Utah, each client has the choice to decline or accept limited (or dual) agency. The Exclusive Buyer Broker Agreement has a designated section that fully explains (and requires a signature to accept) Limited Agency. Also, should the Limited Agency situation actually arise, the client will again have to sign an agreement to this. Each party (the buyer or the seller) has the right to obtain an independent agent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many clients often point out the fact that the Agent will be making double the commission. This should not be a consideration for either party involved in Limited Agency. You must remember this agent will make commission on their listing no matter WHO sells it, and if the Agent is already working with the buyer, then anything the buyer purchases the Agent will make commission on that as well. Essentially any deal could be a &amp;quot;double commission&amp;quot; when an agent works with both buyers and sellers independently. So it is unfair to make the Agents commission a factor or a negotiation tool, for either party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Limited Agency... should YOU participate? I suppose it depends on how well you know your Agent. Will you get the best deal? Possibly. You may have to rely on some of your own instincts and research to determine what the best deal will be, as you will not have full disclosure and advice from your limited agency real estate professional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Wellesley (1769-1852), Duke of Wellington, is reputed to have been the one to exclaim 'All good things come from England, but cavalry is not one of them' while facing Napoleon's French Army at Waterloo on June 18, 1815. Wellesley had learnt his military trade in India applying his study of the art of war and had became a master of the reverse-slope tactic - keeping his forces screened from artillery fire behind the brow of a hill. At Waterloo, however, Wellesley's Armies were outwitted by Napoleon. The French Emperor had imitated Wellesley's tactics by positioning 200 heavy artillery guns behind a ridge at La Haye Sainte. When the Hussars and Dragoons cavalrymen led by Lord Uxbridge attacked in the famous Charge of the Scots Greys, Napoleon commanded the guns on the topline of the ridge and one of the epic artillery bombardments in history began. It was at this very moment, at the height of the Charge and while his 3,000 cavalrymen were being slaughtered by the rapid artillery fire of Napoleon's heavy guns, that the phlegmatic English General is reputed to have exclaimed his now famous remark, directed at Lord Uxbridge who had apparently ordered the Charge without Wellesley knowing it. The day was saved by Gebhard von Blucher (1742-1819), Field Marshal of Prussia, who led the assault of the Kaiser's Prussian Cavalry against the French right wing, thus causing the entire French line to collapse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wellesley's famous remark has been retouched several times throughout the years, depending on one's point of view. The British dropped the second part - the reference to the ill-fated cavalry charge - thus creating the popular short version 'All good things come from England' - period. When about a century later Britain had the unwise idea of attacking the Ottoman Empire and the British and French Armies were fighting the Turks side-by-side in WWI, General Mustapha Kemal - the English-speaking Commander of the Turkish Garrison and victorious defender of Gallipoli - paraphrased the English dictum after 289 days of siege by turning it, somewhat deprecatingly, into: &amp;quot;No good things ever come from England&amp;quot;. And Mahatma Gandhi throughout his teachings of non-violent conflicts resolutions makes reference to the fact that &amp;quot;All good things come from India&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alas, no matter what your point of view is, I shall submit to readers of my Blog that &amp;quot;at least two good things comes from England&amp;quot; : Fee Simple Ownership and Organized Real Estate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
English real estate law (or 'Estate Law' as it was known back then) was imported, through colonization, into the earlier forms of law in the U.S.A., Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Many of these states, or their territories, have since modified this historical law, to varying degrees. A study of the old feudal land system of England provides us with an invaluable glimpse of legal history regulating the most valuable asset of them all: land. In medieval times, land was the sole form of wealth and it depended [https://remaxbelizerealestate.com/ Ambergris Caye Real Estate] primarily on possession. You had it, you owned it. You wanted it, you fought for it. You found it, you kept it. There were no courts or police force ready to recognize or enforce &amp;quot;legal rights&amp;quot; as we know them today. All this changed with the Norman conquest of England in 1066. William decreed that he owned all of the land in England by right of conquest. Not one acre of England was to be exempted from this massive expropriation. This sudden vacuum of privately-held land was promptly filled by a variety of huge land grants given by the new King to either his Norman officers or to those of the English who were ready to recognize him as king. The device used by the King to control and administer his land was that of tenure. Tenure was the key component of the feudal system. The King struck a bargain with a Lord for a large chunk of land. The Lords that held their tenure directly from the King were called Tenants-in-chief. It was this group of persons who formed the basis of English aristocracy and began, by the process of subletting the King's land, the implementation of the feudal system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tenures were of a variety of duration known as &amp;quot;estates&amp;quot; and the Fee Simple Estate was the most extensive and allowed the Tenant to sell or to convey by will or be transferred to the Tenant's heir if he died. In modern law, almost all land is held in fee simple and this is as close as one can get to absolute ownership in common law. It was in this context that the British began their dominion over the seas and their explorations which led to the modern nations of Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. The concept of developing an informal association of local real estate agents originated in the United States in the 1880s, and by the turn of the century about 15 Real Estate Boards had been established. The National Association of REALTORS® (NAR) was formed in the U.S. in 1908 with 19 boards and one state association. Organized real estate in Canada is almost as old as the country itself. The very first Real Estate Board was set up in 1888 in the growing community of Vancouver. Back then, a commercial lot on Hornby Street near the Hotel Vancouver sold for $600. The Vancouver Board - as it was known then - was active until the start of the First World War, when operations were suspended. It resumed in 1919, and has been operating ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinction of the oldest, continuous running Board belongs to Winnipeg, Manitoba. It started in 1903, and the Winnipeg Real Estate Board was the first in Canada to celebrate its 100th anniversary. The Toronto Board was incorporated in 1920, followed by boards in Ottawa, Hamilton, Regina and Victoria in 1921. More than half of the existing Real Estate Boards in Canada were created after 1955, in part because of the evolution of the &amp;quot;Photo Co-Op System&amp;quot; that was introduced in 1951. That was the forerunner of today's MLS®, introduced in 1962. The Co-op System not only created a need for an organization to establish rules and promote co-operation among agents, but also to provide funds to operate a real estate board. That's when technology first changed the real estate industry.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>W9yuibj615</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>